WASHINGTON, D.C. – In a bold continuation of his signature diplomatic style, Donald Trump is reportedly work-shopping new adjectives ahead of his next ultimatum to the Iranian regime.
Sources say the current internal debate centers on whether the warning should be labeled “Very Serious” or upgraded to the more hard-hitting “Extremely Serious.”
The deliberation comes amid already escalating rhetoric, where previous ultimatums have included threats of widespread destruction and “hell raining down” if demands are not met.
According to unnamed aides, the President spent several hours in the Situation Room earlier this week testing different phrasing in front of a mirror, reportedly pausing after each version to rate it on a scale ranging from “strong” to “tremendous.”
One aide described the process as “highly strategic,” noting that “Very Serious” polls well with undecided advisors, while “Extremely Serious” is believed to “project dominance internationally and also just sounds longer.”
The debate has reportedly divided the administration. Some officials argue that “Very Serious” maintains flexibility in case of future backtracking – an approach critics say has become a recurring feature of recent ultimatums, which have sometimes been extended, delayed, or transformed into “productive conversations.”
Others insist that only “Extremely Serious” can match the gravity of recent statements, which have included warnings that entire countries could be “taken out in one night.”
Meanwhile, international observers remain uncertain whether the wording will ultimately matter, as past developments have shown a pattern of last-minute reversals and temporary truces.
In fact, just this week, a looming deadline for military action turned into a two-week ceasefire agreement that is prompting analysts to speculate that the real message behind any ultimatum may simply be: “Serious, but subject to change.”
*Image: AI-generated